Ethics

In line with the centralisation of ethics approval for all Western Australian health and medical research, all new child health ethics applications may now be submitted to WA Health’s Central HREC (Human Research Ethics Committee) or any other HREC accredited under the National Mutual Acceptance (NMA) scheme.

CAHS’ HREC can only accept submissions that are:

  • clinical trials submitted under the National Mutual Agreement (NMA) scheme
  • other national multi-site ethics submissions – under the NMA scheme
  • low-risk risk applications qualifying for review under the low-risk ethics review process.

Applying to HREC

The CAHS Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) conducts ethics reviews and provides advice for all research involving CAHS’ patients, staff, or resources.

CAHS HREC is also the HREC for our collaborators for projects conducted at Perth Children’s Hospital or other CAHS premises.

CAHS HREC operates under the following Guidelines, all of which are also accessible from our Resources page:

For important information regarding the ethics review process at CAHS, refer to the following documents:

Maintaining integrity across CAHS research

Three key documents outline CAHS expectations for good research conduct. These documents also detail the processes in place for managing potential breaches of the Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research.

They are:

Anybody concerned about potential breaches of good research conduct can seek the counsel of 5 trained Research Integrity Advisors:

The advisors are available to provide guidance and advice on issues relating to potential breaches of conduct such as conflicts of interest, authorship disputes or concerns about the management of participants in a study. Each advisor is an experienced clinician with substantial research experience and additional training to further equip them in their advisory role.

Individuals who reach out to an advisor with conduct-related concerns can expect their initial inquiries to be kept confidential. The advisors will be able to advise whether the concerns warrant submission of a formal breach complaint. They can also give direction on next steps.

Review and approval processes

The table below sets out the key dates for CAHS Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) and CAHS Clinical Trials Sub-Committee (CTS).

Month

Application deadline

CTS Meeting

HREC Committee Meeting

2025    

November

Monday 20 October

Thursday 30 October

Thursday 6 November

December

Monday 17 November

Thursday 27 November

Thursday 4 December

 2026      
 February  Tuesday 27 January Thursday 5 February Thursday 12 February
 March  Monday 23 February Thursday 5 March Thursday 12 March
 April  Monday 23 March Thursday 2 April Thursday 9 April
 May Monday 28 April Thursday 7 May Thursday 14 May
 June Monday 25 May Thursday 4 June Thursday 11 June
 July Monday 22 June Thursday 2 July Thursday 9 July
 August Monday 27 July Thursday 6 August Thursday 13 August
 September Monday 24 August Thursday 3 September Thursday 10 September
 October Tuesday 21 September Thursday 1 October Thursday 8 October
 November Monday 19 October Thursday 29 October Thursday 5 November
 December Monday 16 November  Thursday 26 November Thursday 3 December

Public holidays

2025

  • Thursday 25 December | Christmas Day
  • Friday 26 December | Boxing Day

2026

  • Thursday 1 Jan | New Year's Day
  • Monday 26 Jan | Australia Day
  • Monday 2 Mar | Labour Day
  • Friday 3 April | Good Friday
  • Monday 6 April | Easter Monday
  • Monday 27 April | ANZAC Day
  • Monday 1 June | WA Day
  • Monday 28 Sept | King’s Birthday
  • Friday 25 Dec | Christmas Day
  • Monday 28 Dec | Boxing Day
  1. A completed, signed application is submitted to the HREC office via the Research Governance Service (RGS)
  2. When all the necessary documentation has been provided, including the CAHS Ethics application coversheet checklist, the project will be triaged to one of 3 review pathways:
    1. Low risk research – low risk applications will be reviewed by members of the CAHS Low Risk Ethics Committee (LREC) out of session.
    2. Clinical Trials – clinical trials/interventional research will be reviewed by the Clinical Trials Sub-Committee (CTS) at a scheduled meeting prior to a full HREC review.
    3. Full HREC review – research not deemed “lower risk” and not a clinical trial/intervention, will be reviewed by the HREC at a scheduled meeting.
  3. The Coordinating Principal Investigator (CPI) and CPI delegate will receive notification via email by the REG office regarding which level of review your submission requires and time frame for when you will receive notification of the review outcome.
  4. The outcome of the ethics review will be communicated to the CPI via RGS.

If you have any questions about the process or requirements, please contact the REG office team:

Email

CAHS.HREC@health.wa.gov.au

Phone

(08) 6456 0516 or (08) 6456 8539

See below for the current 2024 member lists:

National – NMA Scheme

Under the National Mutual Acceptance (NMA) Scheme, all multi-centre research projects being conducted at public health organisations (PHO) can be ethically and scientifically reviewed by a single NHMRC Certified Lead HREC participating in the NMA. The exception are those research projects that require additional specialist review (refer to the NMA document below for further information). CAHS HREC is a NHMRC certified Lead HREC under the NMA. 

Multi-centre studies submitted for ethics approval in WA, whether originating from WA or other states, must be submitted on a Human Research Ethics Application (HREA) uploaded as a document in RGS. This should be accompanied by the WA-Specific Module (for WA sites) and the Victorian-Specific Module (for Victorian sites).  

For multi-centre studies (e.g. large national or international clinical trials), the CPI is responsible for organising submission of documents for scientific and ethics review by an appropriate lead HREC. 

For further information regarding multi-centre ethics applications, please see
RGS Multi Centre Research.

WA Health only – Single Ethics Review

In WA Health, there is a single-ethics review process in place whereby multi-centre projects to be undertaken at more than one WA Health site (but not occurring outside WA) requires ethics approval from only one WA Health HREC. CAHS HREC is the HREC with expertise and certification in paediatric research. 

Principle investigators (PI) at each site must submit applications for governance review and will be responsible for local approvals and compliance.

Risk profiles of Research (Source: National Statement 2023 – Chapter 2.1, see Resources)

Lower risk

Higher risk
(individual, group, community, societal, global)

Minimal Low Greater than low High

No risk of harm
or discomfort

No risk of harm

Risk of discomfort

 Risk of harm  
Potential for minor burden
or inconvenience
 +/- foreseeable burden  +/- foreseeable burden  +/- foreseeable burden

 

Research projects deemed 'lower risk' will follow a low-risk review pathway for both ethics review, site authorisation and final approval.

Level of risk will be determined by the use of a checklist coversheet and REG office staff will triage submissions accordingly.

Low risk approval pathways are accepted by the National Mutual Acceptance (NMA) Scheme (see the NMA Standard Principles for Operation on our Resources page).

Refer to the following documents for more information, also accessible from Resources.

  • Low Risk Ethics Committee Terms of Reference
  • Research Ethics & Governance Standard Operating Procedures for the Approval of Research
  • National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research

Research that is to be undertaken without the consent of those whose data, tissue or DNA is to be used must include a request for a waiver of consent in the application to the HREC.

All sub-sections of section 2.3.10 (a-i) of the National Statement should be addressed in the application – outlined in either section 6.1.2 of the WA Health Ethics Application Form or Consent section of the Human Research Ethics Application (HREA) and the protocol. 

The opt-out approach to recruitment (or 'opt-out consent') is characterised by:
  • providing information to the potential participant about the research and their involvement
  • participation is presumed unless action is taken to decline.

All sub-sections of section 2.3.6 (a-i) of the National Statement must be addressed in the application – outlined in either section 6.1.2 of the WA Health Ethics Application Form or the consent section of the HREA and the protocol.

Please confirm with the research governance office, prior to site selection, any local or legislative requirements that may impact the researcher’s ability to conduct research with a waiver of consent or opt out approach at a site level.

  • National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (see Resources)
  • CAHS Research Ethics Guideline - Waiver of Consent (see Resources)

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people

The Western Australian Aboriginal Health Ethics Committee (WAAHEC) is registered with the Australian Health Ethics Committee of the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) and exists to promote and support good ethically based health and medical (or the determinants of health) research, which will benefit Aboriginal people. 

In addition to the local or lead HREC approval it is a requirement that WAAHEC approve the conduct of health and medical research in WA where the research project involves the following categories:

  • Aboriginality is a key determinant
  • Data collection is explicitly directed at Aboriginal people
  • Aboriginal people, as a group, will be examined in the results
  • The information has an impact on one or more Aboriginal communities
  • Aboriginal health funds are a source of funding. 
Refer to the Aboriginal Health Council of Western Australia for the WAAHEC Values and Ethics Statement and the ethics application form. 

Submissions to CAHS HREC and WAAHEC may be made in parallel.

If you are thinking about conducting research with Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander peoples, please refer to the following set of principles to ensure research is safe, respectful, responsible, high quality and of benefit to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and communities:

  • Ethical conduct in research with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples and communities (NHMRC). See Resources.

WA Health data collections

Research that requires access to WA Health data collections and/or involve data linkage must be submitted to the Department of Health WA HREC

Refer to the following websites for more information:

University HRECs

Ethics approval by a university HREC cannot be accepted in place of a certified lead HREC under the NMA or WA Health HREC under the single site review.

For research seeking recruitment of CAHS patients and/or CAHS staff or facilities, ethics approval from the CAHS HREC (or other WA Health HREC or certified HREC in accordance with NMA) must be obtained. 

WA Health institutions cannot currently accept the ethics approval granted to a project by a university HREC.

University HRECs may choose to accept the ethics review of the CAHS or other WA Health HRECs.

Other matters requiring Ethics approval

  1. Access to unapproved therapeutic goods – Authorised Prescribers
  2. Case Report: Please confirm with the HREC office regarding the process and documentation requirements

Amendments

Any changes to an approved research study must be approved by HREC prior to implementing the changes.

Submit an Amendment application via the Monitoring tab in the RGS workspace.

Amendments that are considered minor may be approved out of session by the REG office.

Amendments that are considered substantial are triaged according to the level of review the project first underwent:

  • Low risk review – review by Low Risk Ethics Committee (LREC) out of session
  • Clinical Trial – review by the Clinical Trial Subcommittee (CTS) at a scheduled meeting (may also be referred to HREC)
  • HREC – review by HREC at a scheduled meeting

HREC Approval extensions

CAHS HREC approval is for 3 years initially.

Approval up to a further 3 years may be approved out of session by the REG office.

Approval beyond 6 years requires review and approval by HREC.

To request an extension of HREC approval, an Amendment application must be submitted to HREC via RGS.

Progress reports

It is a condition of approval that an annual progress report be submitted on the anniversary of approval to the approving HREC.

Progress Reports may be approved out of session by the REG office.

Progress reports are submitted via RGS in the Monitoring tab of the project workspace.

Safety reporting in clinical trials

Annual safety reports are required to be submitted on the anniversary of approval to the approving HREC for clinical trials.

Annual safety reports may be approved out of session by the REG office.

All Safety Reporting should adhere to the Safety monitoring and reporting in clinical trials involving therapeutic goods (NHMRC). See Resources

NHMRC has also developed other documents to supplement the Guidance and to provide further advice for non-commercial and commercially sponsored clinical trials involving therapeutic goods. 

This supplementary guidance covers the following topics:

  • Data Safety Monitoring Boards (DSMBs)
  • Risk-based Management and Monitoring of Clinical Trials involving Therapeutic Goods
  • Reporting of Serious Breaches of Good Clinical Practice (GCP) or the Protocol for Trials Involving Therapeutic Goods.

These documents are available at Safety monitoring and reporting in clinical trials involving therapeutic goods (NHMRC). See Resources.

Safety reports are submitted via RGS in the Monitoring tab of the project workspace.

To report an adverse event or Serious Adverse Event to CAHS as the sponsor of research please refer to HealthPoint (internal WA Health only).

Final reports

A Project Final Report is required to notify the HREC that the project is complete, and all sites have been closed.

Each site in a project must be closed before the project itself can be closed. Site final reports are required to be completed and submitted to each site RGO when a project is complete.

The Project Final Report is also completed if the project closed prior to the expected completion date.

For a single site study – a site final report submitted to both HREC and RGO is sufficient to close the project workspace.

Site final and Project Final reports are submitted via RGS in the Monitoring tab of the project workspace.

For additional information regarding research monitoring requirements refer to CAHS Standard Operating Procedures for the Approval of Research (see Resources). 

Application fees to the Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC)

Applications by individual researchers for non-sponsored projects or for competitive grant applications do not attract a fee.

An application fee will apply to projects that are sponsored by commercial entities such as pharmaceutical companies or other industry bodies. Fees are payable on initial submission with further charges for amendments.

Commercial sponsorship may be financial or in-kind (e.g. provision of drugs or devices). Fees for in-kind support by commercial agencies may be waived for investigator-initiated studies if the following conditions are included in a WA Health-approved clinical trial agreement:

  • Intellectual Property (IP) arising from the study is not restricted by the commercial agency.
  • Data arising from the study are not provided to the commercial agency for marketing or publicity purposes.
  • The investigator retains full publication rights. There should be no right-of-review restriction by the commercial agency.

The fee* structure for commercially sponsored trials is as follows:

HREC REVIEW

$ Amount (GST included)

 New Applications (including submissions under NMA where CAHS is the lead HREC  $3,850
 HREC Review on behalf of each additional site  $660
 Review of an Amendment (excludes extensions up to 3 years)  $660
 Further review of an amendment (requirement for resubmission of amendment)  $320

Protocol amendments that introduce major new aims such as a new primary or secondary objective, or which introduce major new safety considerations, requiring extensive scientific and/or ethical review, may attract a higher fee. This includes the addition of new sub-studies.

Submission of incomplete applications requiring significant administrative support on behalf of the HREC may be subject to additional fees. This charge will apply to both commercially sponsored and non-sponsored studies.

Fees are payable in full on project submission or amendment. Payment can now be made using the CAHS BPOINT. Please include the last 4 digits of your application’s RGS number and a short payment description (for example, RGS XXXX – new application / amendment 1 / amendment 3.) The ethics/governance review process will not start until fees have been paid.

Please contact cahs.rgo@health.wa.gov.au or cahs.ethics@health.wa.gov.au for more information.

*all fees are inclusive of GST

**this fee may be waived at the discretion of the HREC

Last Updated: 29/08/2025